Home
JAQForum Ver 24.01
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 16:32 25 Nov 2024 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : Maths precedence error in MMBasic? Any maths gurus out there?

     Page 1 of 3    
Author Message
matherp
Guru

Joined: 11/12/2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9110
Posted: 02:17pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3

is calculated by MMbasic as 3.001953125

However, if I convert that to reverse polish I get

3 4 2 * 1 5 - 2 3 ^ ^ / +

which evaluates to 3.00012207

Converting the reverse polish back to infix gives

3 + (4 * 2) / (1 - 5) ^ (2 ^ 3)

Note the 2 ^ 3 is now bracketed hence the different answer. Is the MMBasic operator precedence wrong or right?

UPDATE Wolfram Alpha also gives 3.00012207 so I suspect MMbasic is wrong
Edited 2024-05-07 00:40 by matherp
 
homa

Guru

Joined: 05/11/2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 351
Posted: 02:50pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Hello Peter,
an interesting observation.

ChatGPT 3.5:

To convert the expression "3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3" into Reverse Polish Notation (also known as postfix notation), you can use the shunting-yard algorithm. This algorithm processes operators and operands according to their precedence and associativity. Here's how you can convert the expression:

1. Initialize an empty stack for operators.
2. Initialize an empty list for the output (the reverse Polish notation).
3. Iterate through each token (operands and operators) in the infix expression.
4. If the token is an operand, add it to the output list.
5. If the token is a left parenthesis, push it onto the operator stack.
6. If the token is a right parenthesis, pop operators from the stack and add them to the output list until a matching left parenthesis is encountered. Pop and discard the left parenthesis.
7. If the token is an operator:
   a. While there are operators at the top of the stack with greater precedence or equal precedence and left associativity, pop them from the stack and add them to the output list.
   b. Push the current operator onto the stack.
8. After processing all tokens, pop any remaining operators from the stack and add them to the output list.

Let's apply this algorithm to the given expression:

Infix expression: "3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3"

Output (Reverse Polish Notation): "3 4 2 * 1 5 - 2 3 ^ ^ / +"

Here's the expression step-by-step:

1. Push "3" onto the stack.
2. Push "+" onto the stack.
3. Push "4" onto the stack.
4. Push "*" onto the stack.
5. Push "2" onto the stack.
6. Push "/" onto the stack.
7. Push "(" onto the stack.
8. Push "1" onto the stack.
9. Push "-" onto the stack.
10. Push "5" onto the stack.
11. Pop and add operators "^" (twice) to the output.
12. Pop and discard "(".
13. Pop and add "/" to the output.
14. Pop and add "*" to the output.
15. Pop and add "+" to the output.

So, the reverse Polish notation is "3 4 2 * 1 5 - 2 3 ^ ^ / +".


and

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=3+%2B+4+*+2+%2F+%28+1+-+5+%29+%5E+2+%5E+3

so I think that the MMBasic operator priority is really wrong!  
really really tricky.

Matthias
 
Quazee137

Guru

Joined: 07/08/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 568
Posted: 03:12pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

here is how I read it

3+((4*2)/(1-5)^(2^3)) = 3+8/-4^8 = 3+8/65536 = 3 + 0.0001220703125

in MMB4L
3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3 = 3.001953125

3+((4*2)/(1-5)^(2^3)) = 3.00012207

and

3 + 4 * 2 / (( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2) ^ 3 = 3.001953125

             
hope this helps


Quazee137
Edited 2024-05-07 01:14 by Quazee137
 
twofingers
Guru

Joined: 02/06/2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 1241
Posted: 03:13pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  matherp said  3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3

is calculated by MMbasic as 3.001953125

...
UPDATE Wolfram Alpha also gives 3.00012207 so I suspect MMbasic is wrong


But that's what Excel says:


strange ...
causality ≠ correlation ≠ coincidence
 
JohnS
Guru

Joined: 18/11/2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3800
Posted: 03:14pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Maybe MMBasic mimics GW-Basic?

John
 
NPHighview

Senior Member

Joined: 02/09/2020
Location: United States
Posts: 200
Posted: 03:17pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

As an avid HP calculator (and later, SwissMicros) user, I compliment your approach.

I have a rule of thumb when programming complex calculations, in whatever language: When in doubt, use parentheses liberally to enforce evaluation order.

PEMDAS is one attempt to implement the arithmetic concept of associativity. Here's an excellent explanation of how that is (or isn't) implemented in various programming languages, Excel, Matlab, Wolfram Alpha, etc.
Edited 2024-05-07 01:19 by NPHighview
Live in the Future. It's Just Starting Now!
 
homa

Guru

Joined: 05/11/2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 351
Posted: 03:37pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Very interesting, thank you!
  NPHighview said  
PEMDAS is one attempt to implement the arithmetic concept of associativity. Here's an excellent explanation of how that is (or isn't) implemented in various programming languages, Excel, Matlab, Wolfram Alpha, etc.


and Libre ...



 

Matthias
 
matherp
Guru

Joined: 11/12/2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9110
Posted: 03:57pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

More and more interesting

So we have Excel and MMBasic agreeing but anything that converts to rpn disagreeing

The question is whether to read 3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3

as

3+((4*2)/((1-5)^(2^3))) = 3.00012207

or

3+((4*2)/((1-5)^2)^3) =  3.001953125

Quarzee137. Please can you explain why you interpret the expression to yield the former - which is what the rpn convertor does rather than the first exponentiation operator applying to the (1-5)?
 
vegipete

Guru

Joined: 29/01/2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 1109
Posted: 04:07pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Simplify the problem:

2 ^ 2 ^ 3 = ?

a) = 4 ^ 3 = 64

b) = 2 ^ 8 = 256

My take on precedence is you work left to right for equal level operators, so version a would be the correct interpretation.
Visit Vegipete's *Mite Library for cool programs.
 
JohnS
Guru

Joined: 18/11/2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3800
Posted: 04:07pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  matherp said  anything that converts to rpn disagreeing

Yes, if it's done using the shunting yard algorithm (or an equivalent).  (Er, maybe there's more than one variant of such anyway?)

The same issue crops up with divisions of course.

I was taught that division is done before multiplication and that more than one division next to one another are done left to right.  (Same rule for subtractions BTW.)

"Brackets" (i.e. parentheses) are done first.

I would expect exponentiation to be like division - (higher precedence than division and) done left to right if more than one next to one another.

But it's been a debate for quite some time!!

What result would people like for:
4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) / 2 / 3

and for
4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) - 2 - 3

John
Edited 2024-05-07 02:10 by JohnS
 
matherp
Guru

Joined: 11/12/2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9110
Posted: 04:26pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Reading more into this it appears that exponentiation is conventionally right associative which is what rpn is doing. It is an edge case but I think MMbasic and Excel are probably both wrong if you are going to be purist

From wikipedia

  Quote  However, when exponentiation is represented by an explicit symbol such as a caret (^) or arrow (↑), there is no common standard. For example, Microsoft Excel and computation programming language MATLAB evaluate a^b^c as (ab)c, but Google Search and Wolfram Alpha as a(bc). Thus 4^3^2 is evaluated to 4,096 in the first case and to 262,144 in the second case.

Edited 2024-05-07 02:33 by matherp
 
twofingers
Guru

Joined: 02/06/2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 1241
Posted: 04:48pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  matherp said  ... From wikipedia

  Quote  However, when exponentiation is represented by an explicit symbol such as a caret (^) or arrow (↑), there is no common standard. For example, Microsoft Excel and computation programming language ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

I think that a note in the manual is sufficient. IMHO.

Kind regards
Michael
causality ≠ correlation ≠ coincidence
 
homa

Guru

Joined: 05/11/2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 351
Posted: 04:52pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  matherp said  Reading more into this it appears that exponentiation is conventionally right associative which is what rpn is doing. It is an edge case but I think MMbasic and Excel are probably both wrong if you are going to be purist


Especially since RPN seems to be better defined in the sequence and there are "standardised" instructions for converting to RPN (see above according to ChatGPT).
I also found this: https://www.rpn-calc.com/?q=3+4+2+*+1+5+-+2+3+%5E+%5E+%2F+%2B

Matthias
 
JohnS
Guru

Joined: 18/11/2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3800
Posted: 05:00pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

GW-Basic.exe running under DOSBOX

? 3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ 2 ^ 3
3.001953

John
 
Volhout
Guru

Joined: 05/03/2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 4223
Posted: 05:41pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Peter,

Most formula's I know that raise something to the power X, have some form of a calculation that they raise to that power. Hence there are always parenthesis around the formula. And when that is the case it is simple. You work your was from inside to  outside.

something like: (x+(a+b)^2)^3 makes life simple....

Volhout
PicomiteVGA PETSCII ROBOTS
 
Quazee137

Guru

Joined: 07/08/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 568
Posted: 06:02pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

At engineering class we went from slide rules to TI-84's
that was set to use RPN on power on. So got use to
thinking that way and thats what I saw when looking at
the equation. But the left hand rule should be used now
days. I was just showing how it was being handled by
MMBasic that is the right way to process this equation.



Yes I'm old and it ok.  
Quazee137

p.s. yes I still have both and a lookup book that came with slide rule.
Edited 2024-05-07 04:06 by Quazee137
 
TassyJim

Guru

Joined: 07/08/2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 6098
Posted: 09:08pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

I like the way the calculator program on my phone works.
As I entered the formula, as soon as I entered the ^ an opening bracket was added.
This gave me
3 + 4 * 2 / ( 1 - 5 ) ^ (

If I continued with the brackets used, I ended up with 3.00012207

If I backspaced to remove the opening bracket, I ended up agreeing with Microsoft and MMBasic.

I like my calculator program.
"Panecal Plus" on Android

Panecal evaluates equal precedence left to right but really wants you to think about what you really want.

Jim
VK7JH
MMedit   MMBasic Help
 
LeoNicolas

Guru

Joined: 07/10/2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 479
Posted: 09:47pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

From the android app HiPER Scientific Calculator


 
phil99

Guru

Joined: 11/02/2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 2135
Posted: 10:42pm 06 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

As there is no universal answer, rather than change MMBasic as previously suggested a note in the manual on the rules of precedence would be best.

When in doubt I bracket almost everything then remove pairs one at a time until the result changes, restoring those ones.
 
Frank N. Furter
Guru

Joined: 28/05/2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 828
Posted: 06:26am 07 May 2024
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

This is what my CASIO calculator shows:



Frank
 
     Page 1 of 3    
Print this page
© JAQ Software 2024